Uploaded image for project: 'Blazegraph (by SYSTAP)'
  1. Blazegraph (by SYSTAP)
  2. BLZG-838

explicit bindings get ignored in subselect

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed - Won't Fix
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Affects Version/s: BIGDATA_RELEASE_1_2_2
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Bigdata SAIL
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Note: for this ticket we are using the old BINDINGS keyword instead of the new VALUES keyword.

      In our data we have several items that match the pattern:

      { ?C rdf:type / rdfs:subClassOf * base:TissueSample . }
      

      two of them are

      (based:TissueSample_69) (based:TissueSample_76)
      

      The following query correctly gives two results:

      SELECT ?C
      WHERE {
      { SELECT ?C {
      { ?C rdf:type / rdfs:subClassOf * base:TissueSample . }
      } }
      } BINDINGS ?C
      { (based:TissueSample_69) (based:TissueSample_76) }
      

      The following variation does not:

      SELECT ?C
      WHERE {
      { SELECT ?C {
      { ?C rdf:type / rdfs:subClassOf * base:TissueSample . }
      } BINDINGS ?C
      { (based:TissueSample_69) (based:TissueSample_76) }
      }
      }
      
      

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            Assignee:
            jeremycarroll jeremycarroll
            Reporter:
            jeremycarroll jeremycarroll
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: